From Manual Control to Automation
Manual-first execution establishes safety.
But no system should remain manual forever.
The real challenge is not how to automate, but when automation becomes justified.
In BookiAI, automation is treated as a privilege earned by evidence, not a default capability.
Automation is a policy decisionβ
Automation is often framed as a technical milestone.
In reality, it is a policy decision.
Allowing the Controller to execute automatically means:
- The system accepts responsibility for outcomes
- Human authorization is bypassed
- Errors become system-owned, not user-owned
This requires a higher standard than βit usually worksβ.
Preconditions for automationβ
Before any action can transition from manual to automatic execution, several conditions must be satisfied.
1. Stable assurance outcomesβ
The assurance pipeline must demonstrate:
- High pass rates over time
- Low ambiguity classifications
- Predictable failure reasons
Unstable or fluctuating review outcomes are a signal to remain manual.
2. Low-risk, well-scoped actionsβ
Automation begins with actions that are:
- Reversible
- Narrow in scope
- Low financial and regulatory impact
High-impact actions require much stronger evidence before automation.
3. Consistent human alignmentβ
Manual-first execution produces data:
- How often humans approve
- When humans override
- Why humans reject proposals
Automation is only justified when system decisions align with human decisions consistently.
4. Explicit rollback mechanismsβ
Automation without rollback is negligence.
Before automation:
- Reversal logic must exist
- Audit trails must be complete
- Recovery paths must be tested
If a system cannot undo an action safely, it must not execute it automatically.
Graduated automation levelsβ
BookiAI does not switch from manual to automatic execution abruptly.
Instead, the Controller evolves through levels:
-
Manual only
All executions require confirmation -
Conditional automation
Auto-execute under strict conditions, otherwise require confirmation -
Default automation
Auto-execute with monitoring and rollback
Each level is explicit and reversible.
Automation does not remove reviewβ
Even in automated modes:
- Generate still proposes
- Review still evaluates
- Assurance still applies
Automation only changes who authorizes execution, not how decisions are formed.
This prevents silent degradation.
Why automation must remain revocableβ
Conditions change:
- Models evolve
- Data drifts
- Business rules update
Automation must always be:
- Observable
- Adjustable
- Revocable
A Controller that cannot return to manual mode is not governed.
What comes nextβ
With execution authority defined, the final question becomes:
How does the system expose context
to AI safely and consistently?
π Action Libraries and Controlled Context
Written by ChatGPT, reviewed by the BookiAI team.